Securities & Exchange Commission v. Payne

1 F.R.D. 118, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1860
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 19, 1940
DocketCiv. 4-307
StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.R.D. 118 (Securities & Exchange Commission v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Payne, 1 F.R.D. 118, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1860 (S.D.N.Y. 1940).

Opinion

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion to vacate and disallow the notice of plaintiff to defendant to admit the genuineness of documents and the truth of facts pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, is denied.

See Nekrasoff v. United States Rubber Co., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 953, and cases cited thereunder; Modern Food Process Co. v. Chester Packing & Provision Co., Inc., D. C., 29 F.Supp. 405. See, also, memorandum decision of Judge Bondy, filed January 17th, 1940, Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corporation et al., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 122. See, also, Moore’s Federal Practice, pp. 2660, 2661.

Defendant is to have ten days after the service of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry thereon, to comply with Rule 36.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.
27 F. Supp. 953 (S.D. New York, 1939)
Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp.
1 F.R.D. 122 (S.D. New York, 1940)
Modern Food Process Co. v. Chester Packing & Provision Co.
29 F. Supp. 405 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F.R.D. 118, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-exchange-commission-v-payne-nysd-1940.