University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas

DecidedAugust 7, 2014

Docket01-14-00244-CV

StatusPublished

This text of University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas (University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00244-CV Style: University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas.

Date motion filed*: July 24, 2014 Type of motions: Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel Parties filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel as currently filed is denied and is construed as a notice of appearance. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to note on the docket Lisa V. Cubriel’s appearance as lead counsel of record for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2. If counsel Sandra Salas Horne requests withdrawal, she must file a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 7, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cause number: 01-14-00244-CV Style: University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas.

Date motion filed*: July 24, 2014 Type of motions: Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel Parties filing motions: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel as currently filed is denied and is construed as a notice of appearance. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to note on the docket Lisa V. Cubriel’s appearance as lead counsel of record for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2. If counsel Sandra Salas Horne requests withdrawal, she must file a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 7, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

University of Texas System v. Letitia Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/university-of-texas-system-v-letitia-thomas-texapp-2014.