UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Lowery
This text of 359 S.E.2d 898 (UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Lowery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certiorari in Universal Security Ins. Co. v. Lowery, 182 Ga. App. 125 (354 SE2d 840) (1987), in order to consider the adequacy of corroboration required by OCGA § 33-7-11 (b) (2). The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.
While the evidence here may be subject to credibility concerns, it is nonetheless sufficient. The statutory requirement in cases where there is no physical contact is “description by the claimant of how the occurrence occurred corroborated by an eyewitness to the occurrence other than the claimant.” If the General Assembly had intended to *364 require corroboration by a disinterested third party, it could have so specified.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 S.E.2d 898, 257 Ga. 363, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-security-insurance-company-v-lowery-ga-1987.