Home/Supreme Court/Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co.

Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co.

335 U.S. 912, 69 S. Ct. 481
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 17, 1949
DocketNos. 439 and 440; No. 441
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 335 U.S. 912 (Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Universal Oil Products Co. v. William Whitman Co., 335 U.S. 912, 69 S. Ct. 481 (1949).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 169 F. 2d 514.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Doering
185 F.R.D. 639 (D. Kansas, 1999)
In Re Houck
881 F.2d 494 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
Houck ex rel. United States v. Folding Carton Administration Committee
881 F.2d 494 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
Moya v. Catholic Archdiocese of NM
755 P.2d 583 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1988)
Andersen v. Roszkowski
681 F. Supp. 1284 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
Virgin Islands Housing Authority v. Kathleen David
823 F.2d 764 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Thompson v. Lincoln Budget Corp.
88 Misc. 2d 894 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Kathleen k.wilkin v. Sunbeam Corporation
466 F.2d 714 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
349 F. Supp. 22 (D. Connecticut, 1972)
In Re Vigilant Protective Systems, Inc.
333 F. Supp. 1029 (S.D. New York, 1971)
Lockwood v. Bowles
46 F.R.D. 625 (District of Columbia, 1969)
Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States
287 F. Supp. 374 (S.D. New York, 1968)
United States v. Ross R. Barnett and Paul B. Johnson, Jr
330 F.2d 369 (Fifth Circuit, 1963)
Wkat, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Public Service Television, Inc.,l. B. Wilson, Inc., Intervenors. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Public Service Television, Inc., L. B. Wilson, Inc., Intervenors. North Dade Video, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Elzey Roberts v. Federal Communications Commission
296 F.2d 375 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)
WKAT, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
296 F.2d 375 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)
Martínez v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico
83 P.R. 345 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres Corporation
182 F. Supp. 18 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Louis Gaudiosi, Charles Schwartz, and Randolph Phillips, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company Similarly Situated v. Richard K. Mellon, Robert T. McCracken C. Jared Ingersoll, Walter S. Franklin, James E. Gowen, Philip R. Clarke, James M. Symes, John A. Diemand, John B. Hollister, Lammot Dup. Copeland, Donald Danforth, R. George Rincliffe, William L. Day, Otto N. Frenzel, Fred Carpi, David C. Bevan, James P. Newell, Directors and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation, Incorporated Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Louis Gaudiosi, Charles Schwartz and Randolph Phillips, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company Similarly Situated v. Walter S. Franklin, Richard K. Mellon, Robert T. McCracken C. Jared Ingersoll, James E. Gowen, Philip R. Clarke, James M. Symes, John A. Diemand, John B. Hollister, Lammot Dup. Copeland, Donald Danforth, R. George Rincliffe, William L. Day, Otto N. Frenzel, Fred Carpi, David C. Bevan, James P. Newell, Directors: Bayard H. Roberts and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation Incorporated Under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (Five Cases)
269 F.2d 873 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Gaudiosi v. Mellon
269 F.2d 873 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Marvins Credit, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.
130 A.2d 777 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 U.S. 912, 69 S. Ct. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-oil-products-co-v-william-whitman-co-scotus-1949.