Universal North American Insurance Company v. Tyler Shuler and Remington M. Prince
This text of Universal North American Insurance Company v. Tyler Shuler and Remington M. Prince (Universal North American Insurance Company v. Tyler Shuler and Remington M. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNIVERSAL NORTH AMERICAN ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Plaintiff, No. 2:23-cv-05713-DCN vs. ORDER TYLER SHULER and REMINGTON M PRINCE, ) Defendants. oo) This matter is before the court on defendant Remington M. Prince’s (“Prince”) motion to reconsider, ECF No. 77. To succeed on a motion to reconsider, the movant must demonstrate (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the existence of new evidence not available at trial; (3) or a clear error of law or manifest injustice. Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat. Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998). Prince’s motion to reconsider has not shown any of the preceding circumstances and simply seeks to re- litigate matters already decided by the court. Accordingly, the court will deny the motion. For the foregoing reasons the court DENIES the motion to reconsider, ECF No. 77. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
DAVID C. NORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
December 29, 2025 Charleston, South Carolina
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Universal North American Insurance Company v. Tyler Shuler and Remington M. Prince, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/universal-north-american-insurance-company-v-tyler-shuler-and-remington-m-scd-2025.