United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York
This text of 97 N.E. 1117 (United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that there was evidence from *582 which the jury might have found that the work sued for was included within the original contract and that it was fraudulent and collusive for the defendant’s officials to agree to pay the plaintiff therefor, and, therefore, it was error to refuse to submit the question to the jury; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett and Collin, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, Vann and Hisoock, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 N.E. 1117, 204 N.Y. 581, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-wood-preserving-v-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1912.