United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York

97 N.E. 1117, 204 N.Y. 581, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 816
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 16, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 N.E. 1117 (United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York, 97 N.E. 1117, 204 N.Y. 581, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 816 (N.Y. 1912).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that there was evidence from *582 which the jury might have found that the work sued for was included within the original contract and that it was fraudulent and collusive for the defendant’s officials to agree to pay the plaintiff therefor, and, therefore, it was error to refuse to submit the question to the jury; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett and Collin, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, Vann and Hisoock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Wood Preserving v. . the City of New York
97 N.E. 1117 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
United States Wood Preserving Co. v. City of New York
204 N.Y. 663 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 N.E. 1117, 204 N.Y. 581, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-wood-preserving-v-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1912.