United States v. Znop Byx Vmon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2005
Docket03-11173
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Znop Byx Vmon (United States v. Znop Byx Vmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Znop Byx Vmon, (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT August 4, 2005 No.03-11173 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 00-00060-CR-FTM-29-DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ZNOP BYX VMON, a.k.a Russell Lee Slack,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________

(August 4, 2005)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CARNES, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Znop Byx Vmon was convicted of knowingly making false statements to a

licensed firearms dealer in connection with attempts to purchase firearms, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) and sentenced to 70 months imprisonment. We

affirmed his conviction on direct appeal, in which Vmon raised a constitutional

challenge to his convictions under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. –, 124 S.Ct.

2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), for the first time in his reply brief. Vmon

petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, which the Court granted, vacating and

remanding the case to us for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker,

543 U.S. –, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

This court does not consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief,

and this rule applies to Booker challenges. See United States v. Day, 405 F.3d

1293, 1294 n.1 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Dockery, 401 F.3d 1261, 2005

WL 487735 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Levy, 2005 WL 1620719 (11th Cir.

July 12, 2005). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Garry Dockery
401 F.3d 1261 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Donna R. Day
405 F.3d 1293 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Raphael R. Levy
416 F.3d 1273 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Znop Byx Vmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-znop-byx-vmon-ca11-2005.