United States v. Ziadeh

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ziadeh

192 F. App'x 207

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ziadeh. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 F. App'x 869 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2006·No. 06-6667·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying approval of his proposed “Promissory Note.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ziadeh, No. 3:02-cr-00273-RLW (E.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *208 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying approval of his proposed “Promissory Note.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ziadeh, No. 3:02-cr-00273-RLW (E.D.Va. Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *208 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Ziadeh, 192 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

192 F. App'x 207 (United States v. Ziadeh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.