United States v. Zhivargo Jenkins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2023
Docket23-6706
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Zhivargo Jenkins (United States v. Zhivargo Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Zhivargo Jenkins, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6706 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6706

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZHIVARGO KINTA JENKINS, a/k/a Fefe,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00528-FL-1)

Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023

Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zhivargo Kinta Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6706 Doc: 14 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Zhivargo Kinta Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of

a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d

326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court

did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United

States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation

required for denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. United States v. Jenkins, No. 5:19-cr-00528-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2023).

We further deny Jenkins’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ryan Kibble
992 F.3d 326 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Anthony High
997 F.3d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Zhivargo Jenkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zhivargo-jenkins-ca4-2023.