United States v. Zapata

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 9, 2003·No. 02-51007·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 9, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-51007 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ZAPATA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-655-3 --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Miguel Zapata has moved for

leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zapata

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not

filed a response. This Court’s independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the

Court GRANTS counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw, EXCUSES

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-51007 -2-

counsel from further responsibilities herein, and DISMISSES the

appeal. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Zapata, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Zapata (United States v. Zapata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)