United States v. Zapata
This text of United States v. Zapata (United States v. Zapata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20278 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN OSCAR CELEDON ZAPATA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-10-1 -------------------- February 20, 2003
Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Richard E. Banks, appointed to represent Juan Oscar
Celedon Zapata (“Zapata”) on appeal, has requested leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zapata has not responded to the
motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-20278 -2-
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Zapata, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zapata-ca5-2003.