United States v. Young
This text of United States v. Young (United States v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2017 _________________________________ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 16-1430 (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01431-LTB and 1:07- WILLIAM LYNN YOUNG, CR-00321-LTB-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT _________________________________
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________
This matter is before us on Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Summary
Affirmance. The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s
judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, __S. Ct.__,
2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017). Appellant William Lynn Young does not oppose the
motion.
Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is
affirmed.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Entered for the Court Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-young-ca10-2017.