United States v. Yonkers Board of Education

635 F. Supp. 1538, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15686
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMay 13, 1986
DocketCiv. A. 80 CIV. 6761 (LBS)
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 635 F. Supp. 1538 (United States v. Yonkers Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 635 F. Supp. 1538, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15686 (S.D.N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

ORDER FOR DESEGREGATION OF THE YONKERS PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM

SAND, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On November 20, 1985, this Court held that actions taken by the City of Yonkers and the Board of Education, with respect to housing and public schools, were in whole or in part intentionally segregative. United States v. Yonkers Board of Education 624 F.Supp. 1276 (S.D.N.Y.1985). On December 18, 1985 the Court established a schedule for the action’s remedy phase. The Yonkers Board of Education and the City of Yonkers were directed to submit remedy proposals on or before February 17, 1986.

On February 17, 1986, the Yonkers Board of Education submitted to the Court and the parties its proposed remedial plan, entitled “Educational Improvement Plan for the Yonkers Public School System”. The United States and Plaintiffs-intervenors (hereinafter “the NAACP”) filed their responses to the Board’s remedial proposal by March 12, 1986. On April 2, 1986 the Board filed modifications to its original remedial proposal, entitled “Modifications to the Educational Improvement Plan submitted on February 17, 1986” to which the United States and the NAACP filed responses by April 7, 1986.

The Court conducted a hearing from April 8, 1986 through April 15, 1986 receiving testimony and documentary evidence to assist it in fashioning an appropriate remedy for the unlawful condition of segregation found to exist in the Yonkers Public Schools.

On April 22, 1986, this Court issued its opinion and Proposed Remedial Order. On May 7, 1986, the Board submitted its Response and Objections to the Court’s Proposed Remedial Order. Following consultation with all the parties the Court hereby sets forth its order for the desegregation of the Yonkers Public School System.

A. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

The implementation strategies which form the foundation for the Yonkers public schools Educational Improvement Plan shall include:

1. School Closings

The district shall close the following schools effective September, 1986:

*1541 School # 6

School # 10

School #11

School # 32

School # 34

Fermi Middle School

Hawthorne Middle School

Yonkers High School

2. Elementary Schools

The district shall operate the following elementary schools effective September, 1986:

School # 5

School # 8

School # 9

School # 13

School # 14

School # 16

School # 17

School # 19

School # 21

School # 22

School # 23

School # 26

School # 28

School # 29

School # 30

Enrico Fermi

The attendance zones for these schools shall be those areas set forth in Appendix A. During the 1986-87 school year, the Board shall develop and begin to implement attendance area magnet programs designated for School 19 and Enrico Fermi, to open September 1987.

3. Dedicated Magnet Schools

The district shall operate dedicated magnet schools to reduce racial/ethnic isolation by attracting students to programs that emphasize areas of special interest. Students will be recruited to leave their regular attendance zone school to enroll in schools that have no specific attendance zone. The district shall operate the following district-wide dedicated magnet schools effective September, 1986:

School # 10 — Early Childhood Center (Pre-K) PEARLS — Gifted and Talented (Pre K-6) Hudson River Museum Junior High School — Science, Social Studies and Creative Arts, Gifted and Talented (7-9) Saunders Trades, Technical, Business and Computer High School (and Academic Magnet Component)

Until the new Hudson River Junior High School is completed the 7-9 Gifted and Talented magnet program currently housed in Emerson and Mark Twain will be moved to Hawthorne. In addition, the 4-6 Gifted and Talented component of the PEARLS program planned for September, 1986 will also be housed in Hawthorne. Upon opening of the Hudson River Junior High School Hawthorne shall house the PEARLS program Pre K-6. Until the new Hudson River Junior High School is completed, the Pre K-3 component of the PEARLS program will be housed in School # 32.

Admission criteria for dedicated magnet schools, as well as for other magnet and specialized programs, will be submitted to a court appointed Monitor by June 1, 1986 for the magnet schools and programs to be implemented in September 1986 and by January 15, 1987 for the magnet schools and programs to be implemented in September 1987. Any party may offer its comments on such criteria to the Monitor. This procedure will be followed whenever a new program is slated to commence in the ensuing school term. All magnet students will take the required subjects and course work necessary for promotion and graduation, and all high school magnet students will have the opportunity to meet college entrance requirements. By June 15, 1986 the Board shall provide the Monitor and the parties with a description of the academic magnet program to be offered at Saunders.

4. Attendance Area Magnet Schools

The district shall operate the following attendance area magnet schools effective September, 1986:

School # 18 — Scholastic Academy for Traditional Education (K-6)
School # 25 — Science, Social Studies, Physical Development, Creative Arts, Extended Day (K-6)
*1542 School # 27 — Montessori, Humanities and Creative Arts, Extended Day (K-6) Martin Luther King — High Technology Computer Assisted Instruction, Extended Day (K-6)
Burroughs Junior High School — Career Development and Pre-Vocational (7-9) Emerson Junior High School — Performing and Visual Arts, Multilingual Education (7-9)
Mark Twain Junior High School — Physical Development (7-9)
Gorton Senior High School — Pre-Professional Magnet Program (10-12)
Lincoln Senior High School — Performing Arts Magnet Program (10-12)
Roosevelt Senior High School — Communication Arts Magnet Program (10-12)

Effective September 1987, the following additional attendance area magnet schools will be opened:

School # Multilanguage Options — Global Perspective (K-6)
Enrico Fermi — Computer Assisted Instruction and Performing Arts (K-6)

The attendance zones for all of the attendance area magnet schools are set forth in Appendix A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd v. City of New York
959 F. Supp. 2d 668 (S.D. New York, 2013)
United States v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Third-Party Shirley C. Brown, in Her Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Lora Bradley Chodos, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Thomas Frey, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Willard A. Genrich, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Norma Gluck Emlyn I. Griffith, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Floyd S. Linton, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Vincent Tese United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Samuel Pierce Salvadore Sclafini, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Thomas Sobol Mario Cuomo Martin C. Barrell, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents James McCabe Sr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Mimi Levin Lieber, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Yonkers Community Development Agency, City of Yonkers Cross Yonkers Board of Education v. Yonkers Federation of Teachers Intervenor Yonkers Branch National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Intervenor Cross R. Carlos Carballada, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Louise P. Matteoni, in His Official Capacity as Member of the State Board of Regents Edward Meyer, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Jorge L. Battista, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents State of New York Board of Regents of the State of New York Adelaide L. Sanford, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Regents Urban Development Corporation of the State of New York George Pataki, as Governor of the State of New York Richard P. Mills, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York H. Carl McCall as Comptroller of the State of New York
239 F.3d 211 (Second Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Yonkers Board of Education
123 F. Supp. 2d 694 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Board of Education v. Yonkers Federation of Teachers
154 A.D.2d 210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Yonkers Board Of Education v. United States
893 F.2d 498 (Second Circuit, 1990)
Board of Education of Yonkers City School District v. Yonkers Federation of Teachers
143 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
United States v. City of Yonkers
856 F.2d 444 (Second Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Yonkers Board of Education
837 F.2d 1181 (Second Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 F. Supp. 1538, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-yonkers-board-of-education-nysd-1986.