United States v. Yates

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Yates

473 F. App'x 186

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. 11-7638·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Yates, 473 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related