United States v. Yates

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Yates

473 F. App'x 186

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7638

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Yates, 473 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-yates-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack