United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader

399 F. App'x 146
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 2010
Docket10-2628
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 399 F. App'x 146 (United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader, 399 F. App'x 146 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance.

The district court did not abuse its discretion: among other reasons, Rivera-Ka-der failed to establish that he had a clear and indisputable right to a Rule 35(b) motion because his plea agreement reserved to the government the discretion whether to file such a motion. See In re MidAmerican Energy Co., 286 F.3d 483, 486 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review); In re SDDS, Inc., 97 F.3d 1030, 1034 (8th Cir.1996). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The HONORABLE LAURIE SMITH CAMP, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera-Kader v. United States
179 L. Ed. 2d 345 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 F. App'x 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-yamil-rivera-kader-ca8-2010.