United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader

399 F. App'x 146
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2010·No. 10-2628·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Yamil Rivera-Kader appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the government to file a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance.

The district court did not abuse its discretion: among other reasons, Rivera-Ka-der failed to establish that he had a clear and indisputable right to a Rule 35(b) motion because his plea agreement reserved to the government the discretion whether to file such a motion. See In re MidAmerican Energy Co., 286 F.3d 483, 486 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review); In re SDDS, Inc., 97 F.3d 1030, 1034 (8th Cir.1996). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The HONORABLE LAURIE SMITH CAMP, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader, 399 F. App'x 146 (8th Cir. 2010).

399 F. App'x 146 (United States v. Yamil Rivera-Kader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera-Kader v. United States
179 L. Ed. 2d 345 (Supreme Court, 2011)