United States v. Wynn

140 F. App'x 685
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2005·No. No. 04-30209·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rex Boyd Wynn appeals his 192-month sentence following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Therefore, under [686] United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) and United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 397 F.3d 1248, 1255 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005), amended by No. 03-30387, slip. op. 7773, 7794-95, 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005), we remand for the limited purpose of making that determination.

REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wynn, 140 F. App'x 685 (9th Cir. 2005).

140 F. App'x 685 (United States v. Wynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Isidro Moreno-Hernandez
397 F.3d 1248 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)