United States v. Wright

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 25, 2010
• Docket: 09-6659
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6659

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH)

Submitted: January 11, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Wright appeals the district court’s oral order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction

in sentence. As noted on the district court’s docket sheet, the

court denied relief on Wright’s motion for the reasons stated in

its July 11, 2008 order. The July 11 order reveals that Wright

was not eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 706

because he was held accountable for more than 4.5 kilograms of

crack. Because our review of the record reveals no reversible

error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED