United States v. Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7689
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT G. WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-113-R, CA-98-649-R)
Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert G. Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert G. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-89-
113-R; CA-98-649-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Wright (United States v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.