United States v. Wright
This text of United States v. Wright (United States v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-5318
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM WRIGHT, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-30-N)
Submitted: December 29, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sterling H. Weaver, Sr., WEAVER LAW OFFICES, Portsmouth, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Alan M. Salsbury, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Wright, Jr., appeals the 51-month sentence imposed by
the district court after his previous sentence was reversed and
remanded for resentencing. Wright contends that the district court
erred in failing to depart on the ground of sentence manipulation.
Because a decision not to depart from the guideline range is not reviewable on appeal, United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 (1990), we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Wright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wright-ca4-1996.