United States v. Worrell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Worrell

583 F. App'x 174

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2014·No. No. 14-6637·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-l (E.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-l (E.D.N.C. Apr. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Worrell, 583 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

583 F. App'x 174 (United States v. Worrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related