United States v. Woody

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2010·No. 09-8210·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JASON ALLEN WOODY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00040-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Allen Woody, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jason Allen Woody appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion for reconsideration of

the denial of his § 3582(c) motion. We have reviewed the record

and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. See

United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)

(standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Woody, No. 5:06-cr-00040-1

(S.D.W. Va. Nov. 17, 2009; Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Woody, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Woody (United States v. Woody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)