United States v. Wooden
This text of United States v. Wooden (United States v. Wooden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7487
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERMAN WOODEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-18; CA-96-1591-A)
Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herman Wooden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Herman Wooden appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for post conviction relief and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Wooden leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm the decision of the district court because
Wooden was not entitled to a sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a) & (c) (2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Wooden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wooden-ca4-2004.