United States v. Wood

333 F. App'x 723
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wood. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 F. App'x 910
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2009·No. No. 09-6845·Published

Opinion

[724]*724Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wendell Wood appeals the district court’s orders summarily denying his motion to reopen the appeal period and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United States v. Wood, No. 2:93-cr00090-3 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, 2009 & entered Mar. 16, 2009; filed Apr. 16, 2009 & entered Apr. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wood, 333 F. App'x 723 (4th Cir. 2009).

333 F. App'x 723 (United States v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.