United States v. Wood

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wood. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 F. App'x 910
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2009·No. 09-6845·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WENDELL WOOD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00090-3)

Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 10, 2009

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell Wood, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wendell Wood appeals the district court’s orders

summarily denying his motion to reopen the appeal period and

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of

the district court. See United States v. Wood, No. 2:93-cr-

00090-3 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, 2009 & entered Mar. 16, 2009;

filed Apr. 16, 2009 & entered Apr. 17, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wood, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Wood (United States v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.