United States v. Womack

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Womack. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 F. App'x 651
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2009·No. 08-7996·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7996

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYBURN WOMACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00025-RLW-1)

Submitted: January 26, 2009 Decided: February 13, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rayburn Womack, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rayburn Womack appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Womack, No. 3:05-

cr-00025-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Womack, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Womack (United States v. Womack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related