United States v. Womack
101 F. App'x 407
Opinion
Virgil W. Womack appeals the district court’s order of December 5, 2003, denying his “Motion to Vacate Restitution Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).” We have reviewed the record and the court’s order and find no reversible error in the denial of Womack’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Womack, 101 F. App'x 407 (4th Cir. 2004).
101 F. App'x 407 (United States v. Womack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Procedure for issuance and enforcement of order of restitution
18 U.S.C. § 3664(k)