United States v. Winfield

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 21, 2011
• Docket: 09-6960
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LORENZO LEE WINFIELD, a/k/a Geek,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-3)

Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Lee Winfield, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Lee Winfield appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Winfield, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-3 (E.D. Va. May 6, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED