United States v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wilson

552 F. App'x 253

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2014·No. No. 13-6710·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[254] trict court. United States v. Wilson, No. 1:09-cr-00028-W0-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2013); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 287 (4th Cir.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the máterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[254] trict court. United States v. Wilson, No. 1:09-cr-00028-W0-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2013); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 287 (4th Cir.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the máterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Wilson, 552 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

552 F. App'x 253 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related