United States v. Wilson
This text of 552 F. App'x 253 (United States v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald Lee Wilson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis[254]*254trict court. United States v. Wilson, No. 1:09-cr-00028-W0-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2013); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 287 (4th Cir.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the máterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
552 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilson-ca4-2014.