United States v. Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RBS-10)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 2:95-cr-

00049-RBS-10 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, entered Oct. 30, 2008;

filed Dec. 1, entered Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED