United States v. Willis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Willis. Read the opinion of the Court — 437 F. App'x 269
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 09-7206·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7206

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY MORRELL WILLIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00158-BO-5)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Morrell Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan A. Ontjes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy Morrell Willis appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Willis, No.

5:99-cr-00158-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. June 2, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Willis, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Willis (United States v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related