United States v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 F.3d 125
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 17, 1996·No. 95-40452·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40452 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOE WILLIAMS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-108-1 - - - - - - - - - - May 7, 1996 Before KING, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Williams, Jr., appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Williams has not

shown that either of his confessions to Special Agent King or to

Officer Alldredge were not voluntary. United States v.

Broussard, ___ F.3d ___, (5th Cir. Apr. 4, 1996, No. 94-20685),

1996 WL 159176 at *5 (“A confession is voluntary if, under the

totality of the circumstances, the statement is the accused’s

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40452 -2-

free and rational choice.”) Williams has not shown that the

confession made to Special Agent King was inadmissible because of

a delay in presentment to a magistrate judge. See United States

v. Alvarez-Sanchez, 114 S. Ct. 1599, 1604-05 (1994).

The other evidence in the case is sufficient to support his

conviction because it corroborated his confessions. United

States v. Laury, 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116

S. Ct. 162 (1995); United States v. Ayala, 887 F.2d 62, 67 (5th

Cir. 1989); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84, 93 (1954).

Williams has not demonstrated that the district court

plainly erred in either its instruction to the jury concerning

reasonable doubt or its charge to the jury under Allen v. United

States, 164 U.S. 492, 501-02 (1896). See United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (citing

United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993)), cert.

denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995); United States v.Alonzo, 681 F.2d

997 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1021 (1982).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Williams, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Williams (United States v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Laury
49 F.3d 145 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Broussard
80 F.3d 1025 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Allen v. United States
164 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Opper v. United States
348 U.S. 84 (Supreme Court, 1954)
United States v. Olano
507 U.S. 725 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Albert Alonzo
681 F.2d 997 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez
511 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1994)
United States v. Calverley
37 F.3d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)