United States v. William Walter Wanger

426 F.2d 1360, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9349
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 1970
Docket24673
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 426 F.2d 1360 (United States v. William Walter Wanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Walter Wanger, 426 F.2d 1360, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9349 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is vacated, and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. Mar. 30, 1970).

The appellant did not forfeit his rights under Wade by failing to object to jury instructions which applied the law as it was firmly established prior to Wade, nor should he be penalized for his attorney’s not having requested jury instructions which, at the time of his trial, would have been inconsistent with the law as it then existed. Compare United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. Mar. 6, 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Vasquez
923 N.E.2d 524 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2010)
Sereika v. State
955 P.2d 175 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1998)
Jones v. State
707 P.2d 1128 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1985)
St. Pierre v. State
620 P.2d 1240 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)
United States v. John Joseph Powers
437 F.2d 1160 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Aubrey Kenneth Porter
431 F.2d 7 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Everett Lyle Thomas v. United States
429 F.2d 33 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Jesse Lara Lopez v. United States
427 F.2d 1173 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 F.2d 1360, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-walter-wanger-ca9-1970.