Jesse Lara Lopez v. United States

422 F.2d 395
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1970
Docket23651_1
StatusPublished

This text of 422 F.2d 395 (Jesse Lara Lopez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesse Lara Lopez v. United States, 422 F.2d 395 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of armed bank robbery of the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, California. We affirm.

Appellant was caught red-handed in the lobby of the bank within thirty feet of the window where he committed the robbery. He was identified by at least five eye-witnesses. He had possession of the gun and the paper sack of stolen money when tackled in the lobby by one of the witnesses. The evidence of appellant’s guilt is so overwhelming that we consider this appeal completely without merit. If, as now claimed by appellant, he was the victim of a prohibited police identification line-up, that issue was not before the trial court and is not properly before us.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 F.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesse-lara-lopez-v-united-states-ca9-1970.