United States v. William T. Briggs and Myrtle Briggs

238 F.2d 53, 50 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 667, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5006
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 23, 1956·No. 5377_1·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question in this case is whether the living costs of a managing partner, and of his family, who is required *54 under the partnership agreement to live at the hotel and manage the same are deductible business expenses of the partnership under Section 23(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S. C.A. § 23(a) (1). The trial court in a proper case before it held that they were and the Government has appealed.

In Commissioner v. Doak, 4 Cir., 234 F.2d 704, and in Commissioner v. Moran, 8 Cir., the Fourth and Eighth Circuit Courts in well reasoned cases, upon facts indistinguishable from the facts in this case, held that such expenses were not deductible. We agree with the philosophy of those cases.

The judgment is accordingly reversed and the case is remanded with directions to enter judgment for the Government.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William T. Briggs and Myrtle Briggs, 238 F.2d 53, 50 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 667, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5006 (10th Cir. 1956).

238 F.2d 53 (United States v. William T. Briggs and Myrtle Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurst v. Hurst
344 P.2d 1001 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1959)
Robinson v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 65 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)