United States v. William Ramey-Woodard

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 19, 2024
• Docket: 24-6271
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6271 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6271

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM PRESTON RAMEY-WOODARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Senior District Judge. (7:20-cr-00032-MFU-JCH-1)

Submitted: December 4, 2024 Decided: December 19, 2024

Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Preston Ramey-Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Mitchell Scheff, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6271 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

William Preston Ramey-Woodard appeals the district court’s order denying his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and

conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United

States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating standard of review).

Accordingly, we deny Ramey-Woodard’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm

the district court’s order. United States v. Ramey-Woodard, No. 7:20-cr-00032-MFU-JCH-

1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED