United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee

129 F.3d 1462, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34081, 1997 WL 746792
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 F.3d 1316
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 4, 1997·No. 94-3139·Published

Opinion

*1463 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee, 129 F.3d 1462, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34081, 1997 WL 746792 (11th Cir. 1997).

129 F.3d 1462 (United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
117 F.3d 1231 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)