United States v. William J. Benson

957 F.2d 301, 1992 WL 32751
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 14, 1992·No. 90-1572·Published·Cited by 28 cases

Opinion

This matter comes before the court for its consideration of the following documents:

1. “GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MANDATE” filed herein on 2/5/92, by counsel.
2. “APPELLANT’S OBJECTION TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF MANDATE” filed herein on 2/14/92, by counsel.

On consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the mandate in this appeal issued on 1/22/92 is RECALLED. The court’s opinion issued 8/27/91 is amended as follows:

On page 615 the court’s disposition now reads “REVERSED” but should read “REVERSED and REMANDED”. The clerk of this court will reissue the mandate forthwith. The clerk of the district court shall retain the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. William J. Benson, 957 F.2d 301, 1992 WL 32751 (7th Cir. 1992).

957 F.2d 301 (United States v. William J. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Shah
84 F.4th 190 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Garrit v. City of Chicago
N.D. Illinois, 2022
v. Baker
2019 COA 165 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2019)
Viamedia, Inc. v. Comcast Corp.
335 F. Supp. 3d 1036 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)
United States v. Garcia
793 F.3d 1194 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Thomas Philpot
733 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)
Cage v. City of Chicago
979 F. Supp. 2d 787 (N.D. Illinois, 2013)
United States v. Pree, Bette J.
Seventh Circuit, 2005
United States v. Bonnie L. Urfer and Michael R. Sprong
287 F.3d 663 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Mathes
Fifth Circuit, 1998
United States v. Richard D. Mathes
151 F.3d 251 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Doyle Marshall Willey, Sr.
57 F.3d 1374 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Shay
First Circuit, 1995