United States v. William Davis, Jr.

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7399 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:14-cr-00240-D-1; 5:22-cv-00233-D)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7399 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order striking several motions

from the docket. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 5:14-cr-

00240-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2022). We deny a certificate of appealability as

unnecessary, see Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009), and deny Davis’ motions for

a new trial and for reassignment to a different district judge. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED