United States v. William Abel Yates

690 F. App'x 835
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2017
Docket16-6785
StatusUnpublished

This text of 690 F. App'x 835 (United States v. William Abel Yates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. William Abel Yates, 690 F. App'x 835 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*836 PER CURIAM:

William Abel Yates seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. While this appeal was pending, Yates received a presidential commutation. The commutation renders Yates’ appeal moot. See United States v. Surratt, 855 F.3d 218 (4th Cir. 2017) (dismissed as moot following en banc argument). Accordingly, we deny Yates’ motion to vacate and remand and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.
855 F.3d 218 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 F. App'x 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-william-abel-yates-ca4-2017.