United States v. Wilkerson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2009·No. 08-8612·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8612

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GLORIA DALE WILKERSON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00058-WLO-2)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Norman Cochran, Eric David Placke, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Patrick Auld, David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gloria Dale Wilkerson appeals the district court’s

order denying her motion to modify her sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wilkerson’s

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See United States v. Wilkerson,

No. 1:06-cr-00058-WLO-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilkerson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Wilkerson (United States v. Wilkerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related