United States v. Wilford K. Pulawa

532 F.2d 1301, 37 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1106, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12203
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1976
Docket75-2316
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 532 F.2d 1301 (United States v. Wilford K. Pulawa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wilford K. Pulawa, 532 F.2d 1301, 37 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1106, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12203 (9th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, * Senior District Judge.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from the conviction of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201, and of perjury in the preparation of income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), for three successive tax years: 1969, 1970, and 1971. Appellant was sentenced to three consecutive 5-year sentences *1302 for violations of Section 7201 (Counts II, IV and VI), and three consecutive 3-year sentences for violations of Section 7206 (Counts III, V and VII) — or a total of 24 years.

Appellant’s arguments that his sentences were improperly pyramided are without merit except in one respect. In the statutory scheme of the tax fraud laws, Section 7201 is deemed to be an inclusive section prohibiting evasion of tax in any manner. As the tax evasions of which appellant was convicted were accomplished by means, inter alia, of perjured tax returns, each perjury offense is deemed to be a lessor included offense that merged into the major offense under 26 U.S.C. § 7201, for each tax year in question. Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343, 85 S.Ct. 1004, 13 L.Ed.2d 882 (1965); United States v. White, 417 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1969).

Section 7201 provides a maximum penalty of “not more than $10,000, or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both.” Three consecutive five-year sentences therefore constituted the maximum imprisonment that could be ordered in this case.

Other arguments urged by appellant are without merit.

The judgment is modified by vacating the convictions and sentences on Counts III, V and VII, and, as so modified, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 F.2d 1301, 37 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1106, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilford-k-pulawa-ca9-1976.