United States v. Wiggins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DONNELL SEAN WIGGINS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00034-JBF-JEB-1)

Submitted: April 6, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnell Sean Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donnell Sean Wiggins appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Wiggins, No. 2:06-

cr-00034-JBF-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2008; Oct. 17, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED