United States v. Whitehead
This text of United States v. Whitehead (United States v. Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6246
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1)
Submitted: March 26, 2009 Decided: April 8, 2009
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrees Coloza Whitehead appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Whitehead, No. 3:90-cr-00112-JRS-1
(E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Whitehead, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-whitehead-ca4-2009.