United States v. White

304 F. App'x 163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2008·No. No. 08-7575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Eugene White appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. White, No. 5:04-cr-30019-sgw-7 (W.D.Va. July 24, 2008; Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, 304 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2008).

304 F. App'x 163 (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related