United States v. White

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2008·No. 08-6515·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GAVIN RODERICK WHITE, a/k/a Joe White,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00028-001)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gavin Roderick White, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gavin Roderick White appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence

filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White's motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. White, No. 3:97-cr-00028-001

(W.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2008; Mar. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. White (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related