United States v. White

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2008·No. 08-7575·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EUGENE WHITE, a/k/a Gene, a/k/a Stacks,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:04-cr-30019-sgw-7)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene White, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene White appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying a

reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. White, No. 5:04-cr-30019-sgw-7

(W.D. Va. July 24, 2008; Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. White (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related