United States v. White

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. White. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F. App'x 295
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2002·No. 02-6808·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER WHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-358, CA-02-1487)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher White, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Christopher White appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2002) and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. White, Nos. CR-98-358; CA-02-1487 (D. Md. Apr. 26,

2002; May 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. White, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. White (United States v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related