United States v. White
This text of United States v. White (United States v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7359
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERIC WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-256, CA-96-1844-AM)
Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric White, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eric White seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
clining to reconsider the order denying his motion filed under 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). See Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. White, Nos. CR-92-256;
CA-96-1844-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 31, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. White, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-white-ca4-1999.