United States v. White

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODNEY WHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-91-106)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney White, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rodney White appeals the district court’s order dismissing as

untimely his action seeking to correct a procedurally deficient

forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White’s

motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. White, No. CR-91-106

(E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED