United States v. West
This text of 298 F. App'x 342 (United States v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Byron Joe West, federal prisoner #39638-180, was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s orders transferring to this court his motion to reopen direct appeal and his motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) as unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions.
If necessary, we must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). The district court’s transfer orders were nonappealable interlocutory orders. See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d 515, 516-18 (5th Cir.2001). We are without jurisdiction to consider the present appeal. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. West’s motions for a COA, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and for appointment of counsel are denied.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-west-ca5-2008.